I design Azure landing zones for regulated European estates, take platforms off managed-service providers, and put cost and privilege under the same controls as residency.
I am Group Lead for Cloud and Connectivity at Kanadevia Inova, and I run Ne Plus Ultra Global Solutions for the same work with other EU and Swiss clients. About 19 years of the career has been in IT, and about 9 years in cloud architecture.
The design work is hub-and-spoke and virtual WAN, identity and privilege, Terraform and Ansible, and the cost of the estate. The control set is NIST, ISO 27001, CIS, COBIT, NIS2, DORA, and Swiss nDSG.
Disaster recovery is designed and then exercised. I do not quote a recovery-time guarantee.
Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Certificate, Unix / C++ · 2000
Key achievements
Compliance: at Zurich, gaps against NIST, ISO 27002, CIS, and COBIT fell by 40%.
Identity: enterprise IAM for more than 5,000 users. Identity-related incidents fell by 70%.
Build: at DXC, Terraform and Ansible baselines cut build time by 60% across more than 100 environments.
Cost: cloud spend fell by 25% through rightsizing, a tagging taxonomy, and reservation modelling.
Tickets: at Kanadevia, CMDB automation cut ticket noise by 64%.
Frameworks & standards
Regulatory: DORA, NIS2, ISO 27001, Swiss nDSG.
Governance: NIST, ISO 27002, CIS, COBIT.
Security and identity: IAM, PIM just-in-time access with no standing privilege, HYOK encryption.
Career Track
Group Lead, Cloud & Connectivity
Kanadevia Inova AG
Aug 2025 – Present
Hybrid
Own cloud and connectivity for a 480-server hybrid estate and 14 business-critical applications, with 12 programmes running in parallel.
Compressed the first phase of a 24-month MSP-exit roadmap into six months: decision rights, runbooks, and a parallel cutover off the external provider.
Modelled the three-wave hybrid migration at CHF 160,800 a year in infrastructure run-rate, about 49% of that cost.
Set the Azure landing zone for Swiss nDSG: hub-and-spoke and virtual WAN, HYOK encryption, and PIM just-in-time access with no standing privilege.
Build landing-zone stamps for regulated estates: hub-and-spoke and virtual WAN, residency rules, and a privilege baseline.
Write the MSP-exit method used on those estates: decision architecture, runbook transfer, and a parallel cutover.
Keep the landing zone on its baseline and kill privileged sessions in under 30 seconds. The control set is DORA, NIS2, and Swiss nDSG.
Solution Architect, Data, Cloud and Security
Zurich Insurance
Jan 2022 – Apr 2025
Remote
Architected AWS and Azure estates to NIST, ISO 27002, CIS, and COBIT. Compliance gaps fell by 40%.
Put enterprise IAM in place for more than 5,000 users. Identity-related incidents fell by 70%.
Cut cloud spend by 25% through rightsizing, a tagging taxonomy, and reservation modelling.
Designed cloud disaster recovery and exercised it in quarterly drills.
Cloud Solutions Architect and Cloud Security Engineer
DXC Technology
Dec 2016 – Dec 2020
Remote
Led SAP-to-AWS migrations with encryption and IAM. Cost fell by 20%.
Built Terraform and Ansible baselines to NIST and ISO 27001. Build time fell by 60% across more than 100 environments.
Earlier:
Senior System Engineer, AT&T Global Network Services, remote, 2012–2015. Senior Technical Support Specialist, Dell Technologies, 2011–2012. IT Consultant, 2010–2011. Senior Unix System Administrator, Soitron, 2008–2009. Senior Technical Support Specialist, Corinex, 2007–2008, and onsemi, 2006–2007.
Technical Competencies
Sovereign Cloud & Compliance
Azure landing zones, hub-and-spoke, virtual WAN, HYOK, and PIM. NIST, ISO 27001, CIS, COBIT, NIS2, DORA, and Swiss nDSG.
Resilience & Security Operations
IAM, privileged access with no standing privilege, and disaster recovery that is designed and then exercised.
Cloud, Hybrid & Infrastructure
Azure, AWS, Terraform, Ansible, Azure DevOps, VMware, and Linux.
Cloud Economics & MSP Insourcing
FinOps, rightsizing, tagging, reservation modelling, and taking a platform off a managed-service provider.
Training & courses
Automation with Ansible · Red HatRed Hat Virtualization · Red HatRed Hat System Administration III · Red HatArchitecting on AWS · AmazonArchitecting Microsoft Azure Solutions · Microsoft
The same engagements as the CV. Select a card to read the write-up.
Kanadevia Inova · MSP exit
First phase of an MSP exit on a 480-server estate
A 480-server hybrid estate and 14 business-critical applications. The first phase of a 24-month MSP exit, done in six months. CMDB automation cut ticket noise by 64%. The 49% run-rate figure is a model.
Kanadevia Inova AG · Group Lead, Cloud & Connectivity · Aug 2025 – Present
First phase of an MSP exit on a 480-server estate
480server hybrid estate
14business-critical applications
49%of run-rate, modelled
I own cloud and connectivity for a 480-server hybrid estate and 14 business-critical applications, with 12 programmes running in parallel. The first phase of a 24-month MSP-exit roadmap was compressed into six months: decision rights, runbooks, and a parallel cutover off the external provider.
The three-wave hybrid migration is modelled at CHF 160,800 a year in infrastructure run-rate, about 49% of that cost. That figure is a model, not a saving already taken. CMDB automation cut ticket noise by 64%. The Azure landing zone for Swiss nDSG is hub-and-spoke and virtual WAN, HYOK encryption, and PIM just-in-time access with no standing privilege.
Ne Plus Ultra Global Solutions · Sep 2024 – Present
Landing-zone stamps for regulated estates
Landing-zone stamps for regulated estates: hub-and-spoke and virtual WAN, residency rules, and a privilege baseline. The MSP-exit method is decision architecture, runbook transfer, and a parallel cutover. Privileged sessions can be killed in under 30 seconds. The control set is DORA, NIS2, and Swiss nDSG.
Zurich Insurance · Jan 2022 – Apr 2025
Identity, compliance, and cost on an insurance estate
−40%compliance gaps
−70%identity incidents
−25%cloud spend
AWS and Azure estates aligned to NIST, ISO 27002, CIS, and COBIT. Enterprise IAM for more than 5,000 users. Cloud spend fell by 25% through rightsizing, a tagging taxonomy, and reservation modelling. Disaster recovery was designed and exercised in quarterly drills.
DXC Technology · Dec 2016 – Dec 2020
Terraform and Ansible baselines across more than 100 environments
SAP-to-AWS migrations with encryption and IAM. Cost fell by 20%. Terraform and Ansible baselines aligned to NIST and ISO 27001. Build time fell by 60% across more than 100 environments.
Notes on the landing zone, cost, and the forge. Select a card to read the note.
Forge · Self-hosted
Self-hosted GitLab CE: what, why, where, and how
GitLab Community Edition on an OVH VPS, behind the WireGuard mesh, at git.neplusultra.eu. The website describes the forge. The website does not host it.
The forge for this practice is GitLab Community Edition on a machine I operate. It is not GitLab.com, and it is not this website.
What
GitLab CE is the omnibus install: Git, merge requests, CI, and a container registry. Gitaly stores the repositories. Workhorse and Puma serve the application. Sidekiq runs the jobs. Postgres and Redis stay inside the same install. A Runner on that host runs the pipelines.
What. One omnibus install. The runner stays on the same machine as the repositories.
Why
A hosted forge holds the history, the CI credentials, and the images. That is another operator. Source is part of the baseline. If it can only be read by asking the vendor, the estate has not left.
Where
The install sits on an OVH VPS, the second node of the WireGuard mesh, at git.neplusultra.eu. This website stays on the hub. A public browser receives a mesh-required refusal. Operators reach the forge over WireGuard.
Where. The website and the forge share a front door. Only the website is public.
How
Ubuntu 24.04 on the OVH node. GitLab CE omnibus in rootless Podman. The Runner is a service on the same host. Caddy on the hub terminates TLS and only forwards clients already on the mesh. The key agreement on that name is the hybrid group X25519MLKEM768.
The forge is part of the estate. The website can describe it. The website does not host it.
Residency, HYOK, and PIM with no standing privilege belong in the landing zone. Terraform and Ansible carry that baseline into the next environment. Measured results are on the Zurich and Kanadevia studies: compliance gaps down 40%, identity-related incidents down 70%.
Article · By Sashree Seepersad · Principal Enterprise Architect
Tagging, an MSP exit, and a modelled run-rate
As cloud investments mature, enterprise organizations frequently reach a tipping point where Managed Service Provider (MSP) markup, unoptimized resource provisioning, and fragmented tagging lead to unsustainable cloud spend growth.
The Pitfalls of Legacy MSP Models
Many enterprise MSP models rely on fixed resource markups or opaque management fees, creating a structural disincentive to rightsize cloud environments. When combined with uncoordinated cloud migrations, organizations often find themselves paying premium cloud rates for legacy operational patterns.
The 3-Phase FinOps Strategy
Phase 1Tagging & Visibility
Phase 2MSP Insourcing
Phase 3Unit Economics
Granular Tagging Taxonomy & Visibility Engineering. Before cutting costs, you must allocate them accurately. Implementing automated tagging policies across AWS and Azure links every running resource to specific business units, applications, and environments.
High-Velocity MSP Insourcing. Transitioning cloud infrastructure management in-house or extracting estates from third-party MSPs enables direct hyperscaler billing discounts, reserved instances, and savings plans. On the Kanadevia estate, the three-wave hybrid migration is modelled at CHF 160,800 a year in infrastructure run-rate, about 49% of that cost. That figure is a model, not a saving already taken. At Zurich, cloud spend fell by 25% through rightsizing, a tagging taxonomy, and reservation modelling.
Unit Economics & Continuous Rightsizing. Shift focus from overall spend to unit cost efficiency (e.g., cost per API transaction or active user). Automated shut-down schedules, storage tier lifecycle policies, and rightsizing workloads ensure continuous financial optimization.
Sashree Seepersad is a Principal Cloud Architect. He is Group Lead for Cloud and Connectivity at Kanadevia Inova, and founder of Ne Plus Ultra Global Solutions. About 19 years of his career has been in IT, and about 9 years in cloud architecture.
What does he design?
Azure landing zones with hub-and-spoke and virtual WAN, HYOK encryption, and PIM just-in-time access with no standing privilege. The control set is NIST, ISO 27001, CIS, COBIT, NIS2, DORA, and Swiss nDSG.
Which results are documented?
At Zurich, compliance gaps fell by 40%, identity-related incidents fell by 70%, and cloud spend fell by 25%. At DXC, Terraform and Ansible baselines cut build time by 60% across more than 100 environments. At Kanadevia, CMDB automation cut ticket noise by 64%. The three-wave migration is modelled at CHF 160,800 a year in infrastructure run-rate, about 49% of that cost.
How do you reach him?
Use the form on this page. The company site is neplusultra.eu.
Contact
The notes above are the same record as the CV.
Thank you! Your message has been sent directly to Sashree Seepersad.